For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a good friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of basic triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and very amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and very verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to expand his variety, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective however let's construct it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' content on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best performing markets on the unclear promise of development."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library containing public data from a wide variety of sources will also be made offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector visualchemy.gallery required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure the length of time I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.